March 22 2024
It seems that today many people are wondering about the truth or falsity of every crisis. Are these dire events real, or are they in some way staged? The term crisis actor is frequently used to describe people who are supposedly helping to stage these events. What is the true nature of the crisis actor?
In any story concerning a huge tragedy, one must trust yet verify. For many tragedies have happened over the past few decades, but only in the past decade has doubt been cast so greatly on these events. It was clear that the Columbine shooting was done by two boys out of their minds. So why was the Sandy Hook shooting the subject of such intense debate, often involving people who apparently believe that no one died in that event. This is likely because of intentional misinformation which is spread in order to discredit independent investigators.
Michael Collins Piper devoted many hours of his radio show, The Piper Report, to investigating the facts regarding the Sandy Hook shooting. Piper believed that the children were indeed shot there. Yet he felt he had to deal with Sandy Hook because so many other people were covering it.
One of the bizarre aspects of the Sandy Hook incident is its relation to Alex Jones. Jones was eventually sued in court by the families of the victims. They said that Jones encouraged his followers to harass them.
As usual, Alex Jones is often the establishment’s madman, who is used by the CIA/Mossad to promote falsehoods, while pretending to be on the side of truth and justice. Perhaps he began with good intentions, but he has become a strange caricature of his former self. You can be sure that he is counting his money all the way to the bank.
The concept of the crisis actor has helped to undermine the previously held notion that events reported in the media are generally true. Even though most of the news is fake, this does not mean that many shootings and catastrophes are false events. One must first investigate such events and provide evidence before jumping to conclusions.
At the same time, I could surmise that the term “crisis actor” is an oxymoron. For all actors must by necessity pretend to be gripped by some “crisis”, even if it is only a frivolous crisis, such as those that Rowan Atkinson suffers while portraying Mr. Bean.
The widespread worship of Movies and Television has led many people to believe in the fake reality portrayed by actors. Movies have a retarded logic of their own, where the dumbest things possible can happen, and you are expected to nod your head and smile in agreement at them.
It is not surprising that the notion of the crisis actor has taken root in the 21st century. The Disneyland world of American media laid the groundwork for a world of make-believe in the 20th century. Those who have “itching ears” are in love with the notion of the crisis actor.
Perhaps it gives a sense of comfort to believe that no one died at Sandy Hook. Instead one can blame the CIA, the media, the government, or even the gun manufacturers. Did the people who made the rifles used in that shooting commit the murders? No, but they are held responsible for them because they made the rifles. So perhaps the notion of crisis actors has helped to soften everyone’s minds, so that everyone can sue anyone that they believe is responsible for something, even if they had nothing to do with it.
Simply saying that events are staged is not enough, one must provide the necessary evidence.
In the case of the COVID/SARS-2 incident in 2020, there was a lot of fear mongering by the WHO, the media, and the governments of the world. There was suggestions from the Royal College of London, England, that millions would die, unless there was a two week total shutdown of everything. And what was the authority behind their statement? It was in their computer modeling.
So perhaps in that case, their computers were the crisis actors, fed with data to indicate that a severe crisis was at hand. The British politicians and doctors disregarded their own orders to remain at home. There were no incidents of masses of people dying, at least not from any natural disease.
The notion of the crisis actor is half baked on its face. If there are large groups of coordinated actors staging events, then there must be powerful groups funding and managing them. Of course, 9/11 and other false flag events were staged by the CIA/Mossad. It’s clear that many people died in those events. Yet their official investigations found only some random Arabic Muslims to blame.
Was the Boston Marathon bombing of 2013 a staged event? Many people online have suggested that it was faked, and staged in some way. They say this even in spite of the fact that many photos were released showing men with their limbs blown off. So I think it is clear that this event happened as it appeared in the photographs of it.
What was the purpose of saying that the Boston Marathon bombing was staged, or any other mass casualty event? It appears the purpose is to undermine faith in reality. Once you believe that such attacks are fake without evidence, there is no limit to what you will believe.
It would seem that the notion of the crisis actor was cooked up by the CIA/Mossad to divert attention from their crimes. The popularity of the Sandy Hook conspiracy was such that many people profited from claiming it was a hoax. By focusing people’s attention on baseless conspiracy theories, these intelligence agencies protect themselves from people investigating their actual actions.
As computers and technology become more sophisticated, there becomes a greater emphasis on having everyone live their lives online. Yet this online world is exactly the false reality which gave us the concept of the crisis actor.
On the internet anyone can say anything, and their word can be promoted without question. This is how the notion of the crisis actor was able to take root. By diving deeper into the Satanically created digital world, one becomes more in tune with its false reality. In that false reality, everyone is invited to become a crisis actor, which is indeed the ultimate victim.
The worship of victimhood has been taken to huge levels in the past century. The crisis actor is his own victim, and is a victim of reality. He has succumbed to the daggers of conscience, and the depths of unreason.
On Oct.7th 2023, the Islamic militant group Hamas launched an offensive against the Israeli army occupying Palestine. Immediately many Jews began shouting in the media that atrocities were taking place. One of their favorite early stories to tell regarded the beheading of forty babies. But upon closer examination, this tale was found to have no basis in reality.
The woman who came up with that tale was playing the role of the crisis actor. She claimed knowledge of unspeakable evil, as being witness to savage brutality almost beyond comprehension. But there was no evidence for her claims. She has ended up being the victim of her own victimhood.
On the contrary, many images have been released showing Palestinian babies who died from starvation. Death by starvation is no less cruel than death by the knife or the gun. And so many people have become aware of a clear conflict between falsehood and reality in this conflict.
The crisis actor can only thrive in the minds of those who have lost touch with reality. There are many people who are well paid by the CIA/Mossad to promote “crisis actors” and their kosher certified fake events. But I believe that one must set themselves apart from these fake conspiracies.
As long as people accept wild conspiracies without evidence, there will be crisis actors in their future.
But if we are in touch with reality, then we have a chance of understanding life as it truly is.
Faith and Reason 451 